"sm70- why not Duesenberg?" (sm70-whynotduesenberg)
03/02/2017 at 12:00 • Filed to: None | 0
| 34 |
Alrighty, no more Mr. Nice Guy. In this week’s film, only one car appears onscreen. It does so extremely briefly, and to make things more difficult, the car is a 1902 Locomobile steam car. This is probably almost impossible to get without cheating. But I’m still not allowing cheating. Hop to it!
EDIT: I’m calling this one, and giving it to jariten1781. The film was The Prestige (2006) starring Hugh Jackman, Christian Bale, Scarlett Johansson, Michael Caine, and David Bowie.
My X-type is too a real Jaguar
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
03/02/2017 at 12:10 |
|
It’s a Mad Mad Mad Mad World? Or was that Curved Dash Olds?
xyzabc
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
03/02/2017 at 12:11 |
|
One like it, sure. Easy. But not that exact car in the picture.
Svend
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
03/02/2017 at 12:12 |
|
I want to say, 1960 The Time Machine.
I don’t recall any cars as such but there may of been one pass the shops as the traveller looks on from his chair.
sm70- why not Duesenberg?
> My X-type is too a real Jaguar
03/02/2017 at 12:12 |
|
That movie had tons of cars, none of which were anything like this?
crowmolly
> My X-type is too a real Jaguar
03/02/2017 at 12:13 |
|
!!! UNKNOWN CONTENT TYPE !!!
sm70- why not Duesenberg?
> xyzabc
03/02/2017 at 12:13 |
|
That’s correct, the one in the film had fenders and was a sort of teal color.
crowmolly
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
03/02/2017 at 12:14 |
|
Alrighty, no more Mr. Nice Guy.
Dazed and Confused
sm70- why not Duesenberg?
> Svend
03/02/2017 at 12:14 |
|
Nope, not that.
My X-type is too a real Jaguar
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
03/02/2017 at 12:15 |
|
In my foggy memory of watching tons of movies while recovering from injuries suffered in a wreck 4 years ago I thought there was a car like that in that movie, oh well I was on a lot of pain killers.
haveacarortwoorthree2
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
03/02/2017 at 12:15 |
|
Was it the Jeremy Irons’ Time Machine movie? I never knew the name of the car, but I remember talking with my son about it when it took off in a cloud of smoke and he asked if it was a Model T (I at least knew enough to say no to that). We watched the movie because he had to contrast the movie with the book for a school assignment — it (the movie, not the report) was awful, IMO.
xyzabc
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
03/02/2017 at 12:15 |
|
...and a single headlamp on the front, I think. But, hey. I’m keeping quiet.
sm70- why not Duesenberg?
> crowmolly
03/02/2017 at 12:15 |
|
HA!
RamblinRover Luxury-Yacht
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
03/02/2017 at 12:16 |
|
I cheated.
sm70- why not Duesenberg?
> haveacarortwoorthree2
03/02/2017 at 12:16 |
|
Nope
sm70- why not Duesenberg?
> RamblinRover Luxury-Yacht
03/02/2017 at 12:16 |
|
Well done.
sm70- why not Duesenberg?
> xyzabc
03/02/2017 at 12:17 |
|
One center, and one on each fender. If you know it, say it, just not if you went to IMCDB ;)
jariten1781
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
03/02/2017 at 12:19 |
|
The only movies off the top of my head that were set in that decade were My Fair Lady, Wizard of Oz, Howard’s End and The Prestige.
I don’t remember any autos in any of them.
sm70- why not Duesenberg?
> jariten1781
03/02/2017 at 12:20 |
|
One of those is the correct answer.
Ash78, voting early and often
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
03/02/2017 at 12:21 |
|
Not to ride coattails here, but I’m guessing Oz. I believe the bitchy/witchy woman drove it to the Gale house to moan about Toto and flaunt her wealth.
RamblinRover Luxury-Yacht
> Svend
03/02/2017 at 12:22 |
|
Ironically (I know because I cheated), the *new* Time Machine movie *does* have a 1902 Locomobile, but not of the type in the picture. So, both almost correct movie and almost correct car, but neither quite.
sm70- why not Duesenberg?
> Ash78, voting early and often
03/02/2017 at 12:23 |
|
Not the Wizard of Oz.
haveacarortwoorthree2
> RamblinRover Luxury-Yacht
03/02/2017 at 12:31 |
|
Thank you! I guessed the later Time Machine movie because I remembered a steam-powered car in it, but I didn’t know what it was.
haveacarortwoorthree2
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
03/02/2017 at 12:36 |
|
I like RamblinRover’s answer better!
xyzabc
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
03/02/2017 at 13:10 |
|
Did some digging after my hunch. Again, not going to spoil what you’re trying to do here. Good series of posts.
sm70- why not Duesenberg?
> xyzabc
03/02/2017 at 13:58 |
|
I doubt anyone will get it at this point, beyond the person who listed it as a possibility. I appreciate your courtesy though.
xyzabc
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
03/02/2017 at 16:28 |
|
Pretty sure it was’t “Gone in 60 Seconds”....
The Compromiser
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
03/02/2017 at 18:35 |
|
A Connecticut Yankee in king Arthur’s court.
sm70- why not Duesenberg?
> The Compromiser
03/02/2017 at 18:43 |
|
Not that
The Compromiser
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
03/02/2017 at 18:55 |
|
I wonder what that one was....
The Compromiser
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
03/02/2017 at 21:04 |
|
Here it is. This one could be a challenge.
ttyymmnn
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
03/03/2017 at 09:50 |
|
Fast and the Furious -87: Fetch the Flivver
punkgoose17
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
03/03/2017 at 09:59 |
|
I am guessing Howard’s End? (I’ve never seen the movie. I just want to know the answer.)
punkgoose17
> punkgoose17
03/03/2017 at 10:02 |
|
I looked it up now I know.
haveacarortwoorthree2
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
03/03/2017 at 11:01 |
|
So not Oz. Someone else said Howard’s End. So I’ll take The Prestige (subject to my objection that my original answer of The Time Machine remake really should be accepted!).